Totally fine to hold off. When you’re ready, here’s a safe, no-risk way to peek at both DBs (text first, vectors second), see what’s actually in there, and grab small samples without touching ingestion.
0) Connect read-only
Create a read-only role once, then use it for all browsing:
CREATE ROLE oogway_ro LOGIN PASSWORD 'readonly';
GRANT CONNECT ON DATABASE ougway_db TO oogway_ro;
GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA public TO oogway_ro;
GRANT SELECT ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO oogway_ro;
ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES IN SCHEMA public GRANT SELECT ON TABLES TO oogway_ro;
Then:
psql -U oogway_ro -d ougway_db
1) See what tables you’ve got
-- all tables
\dt
-- schema for a table you care about (adjust name)
\d+ content_chunks
Typical columns you’ll want: doc_id, chunk_id, chunk_index, text, source, url, created_at, and (in the vector table) embedding vector(768).
2) Quick sanity checks on the TEXT side
-- a few rows, just to eyeball
SELECT doc_id, chunk_index, LEFT(text, 400) AS preview
FROM content_chunks
LIMIT 10;
-- random sample (cheap-ish)
SELECT doc_id, chunk_index, LEFT(text, 400)
FROM content_chunks
ORDER BY random()
LIMIT 10;
-- how big is this thing?
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM content_chunks;
-- average chunk length
SELECT AVG(char_length(text)) AS avg_chars, MIN(char_length(text)) AS min_chars, MAX(char_length(text)) AS max_chars
FROM content_chunks;
-- top sources (if you stored one)
SELECT source, COUNT(*) AS chunks
FROM content_chunks
GROUP BY 1
ORDER BY chunks DESC
LIMIT 20;
-- quick language sniff if you stored lang
SELECT lang, COUNT(*) FROM content_chunks GROUP BY 1 ORDER BY 2 DESC;
3) Reconstruct a whole doc (to see if chunking feels readable)
-- stitch first N docs back together by chunk order
SELECT doc_id,
string_agg(text, ' ' ORDER BY chunk_index) AS doc_preview
FROM content_chunks
GROUP BY doc_id
LIMIT 1;
-- or export one stitched doc to file (run in psql, it writes on the SERVER)
\copy (
SELECT string_agg(text, E'\n\n' ORDER BY chunk_index)
FROM content_chunks
WHERE doc_id = 'SOME_DOC_ID'
) TO '/tmp/sample_doc.txt';
(If you prefer client-side: \copy (...) TO 'sample_doc.txt' WITH CSV QUOTE E'\b'; will dump to your current shell dir.)
4) Spot duplicates / near-duplicates
-- exact duplicate text chunks
SELECT md5(text) AS h, COUNT(*) AS n
FROM content_chunks
GROUP BY 1
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1
ORDER BY n DESC
LIMIT 20;
-- same doc, repeated chunk indexes
SELECT doc_id, chunk_index, COUNT(*) AS n
FROM content_chunks
GROUP BY 1,2
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1
ORDER BY n DESC
LIMIT 20;
5) Lightweight size & growth
-- db and table sizes
SELECT pg_size_pretty(pg_database_size('ougway_db')) AS db_size;
SELECT relname,
pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size(relid)) AS total,
pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size(relid)) AS table_only,
pg_size_pretty(pg_indexes_size(relid)) AS indexes
FROM pg_catalog.pg_statio_user_tables
ORDER BY pg_total_relation_size(relid) DESC
LIMIT 15;
6) Peek at the VECTOR side (without heavy queries)
-- confirm dimension
SELECT relname, atttypid::regtype
FROM pg_attribute
JOIN pg_class ON pg_class.oid = attrelid
WHERE attname = 'embedding' AND relkind = 'r';
-- sample embedding slice
SELECT doc_id, chunk_index, embedding[1:8] AS first8
FROM content_chunks
LIMIT 5;
-- nearest-neighbor sanity check (pick one random chunk)
WITH q AS (
SELECT embedding FROM content_chunks ORDER BY random() LIMIT 1
)
SELECT c.doc_id, c.chunk_index, LEFT(c.text, 200) AS preview, c.embedding <-> q.embedding AS dist
FROM content_chunks c, q
ORDER BY dist
LIMIT 5;
(If you created an HNSW index, the k-NN query will use it automatically; still, run sparingly on huge tables.)
7) Export a tiny browsing set for LibreOffice or a text editor
-- 1,000 random chunks to CSV
\copy (
SELECT doc_id, chunk_index, source, LEFT(text, 2000) AS text_2k
FROM content_chunks
ORDER BY random()
LIMIT 1000
) TO 'sample_chunks.csv' WITH CSV HEADER;
Open that CSV in LibreOffice Calc or Base. If you do use Base as a live viewer, connect via JDBC/ODBC using the oogway_ro user so you can’t write by accident.
8) If you want a friendlier GUI
- DBeaver (
sudo snap install dbeaver-ceor from .deb) — great table browser, easy read-only connection, fast filters. - pgAdmin 4 — official, a bit heavier, but fine for browsing schemas and running read-only queries.
9) Is the Pile-Uncopyrighted “worth it”?
You don’t have to ingest the whole thing to decide. Pull a stratified sample by source/domain and skim:
-- per-source 50-row sample (adjust source column name)
WITH ranked AS (
SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY source ORDER BY random()) AS rn
FROM content_chunks
)
SELECT source, doc_id, chunk_index, LEFT(text, 400)
FROM ranked
WHERE rn <= 50
ORDER BY source, doc_id, chunk_index;
Skim that output and you’ll quickly get a feel for quality, domains, and whether you want to keep pushing ingestion.
If you want, say the word and I’ll draft a one-page “DB peek” cheat sheet you can paste next to your rig — just the half-dozen commands you’ll actually use day-to-day.
Well, if this is actually going to continue properly with this ingestion, I'm glad we put it in numerical order because at some point I'm going to need to remove the already ingested data so that this can continue. So knowing from 0, 0, 0, 0 through whatever we got to is much more advantageous so that I can remove those files from the drive.
Smart. Let’s make cleanup/resume bulletproof so you can safely remove (or archive) files you’ve already ingested and let the run continue.
A. Minimal, robust pattern (works today)
1) Track progress atomically
After each file finishes, write a tiny checkpoint (overwrite each time):
# inside your ingest loop, AFTER successful commit:
printf '%s\n' "$FILENAME" > /mnt/storage/tokenspace/ingest_checkpoint.txt
If your files are strictly zero-padded numeric like 0000.txt … 15342.txt, also record the numeric seq:
# e.g., 0082.txt -> 82
seqnum="${FILENAME%.txt}"
seqnum="${seqnum#0}" ; [ -z "$seqnum" ] && seqnum=0
printf '%s\n' "$seqnum" > /mnt/storage/tokenspace/ingest_checkpoint.seq
2) Safe archive (then delete)
Run this anytime (even while ingesting) — it only touches files ≤ the last completed seq.
Dry-run first:
CHECK='/mnt/storage/tokenspace/ingest_checkpoint.seq'
SRC='/mnt/storage/pile_uncopyrighted'
ARCH='/mnt/storage/pile_archived'
mkdir -p "$ARCH"
seq_done=$(cat "$CHECK" 2>/dev/null || echo -1)
echo "[dry-run] would move:"
find "$SRC" -maxdepth 1 -type f -name '[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]*.txt' \
| sort -V \
| awk -v n="$seq_done" '
{ f=$0; gsub(/^.*\//,"",f); sub(/\.txt$/,"",f); sub(/^0+/,"",f); if(f=="") f=0;
if (f+0 <= n+0) print $0 }' \
| sed "s|^| -> |"
If it looks right, move to archive:
find "$SRC" -maxdepth 1 -type f -name '[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]*.txt' \
| sort -V \
| awk -v n="$seq_done" '
{ f=$0; gsub(/^.*\//,"",f); sub(/\.txt$/,"",f); sub(/^0+/,"",f); if(f=="") f=0;
if (f+0 <= n+0) print $0 }' \
| xargs -I{} mv -v "{}" "$ARCH"/
Optional delete after archive verification:
# Only do this after you’re happy with the archive
rm -v "$ARCH"/*.txt
> Why sort -V + awk? It handles zero-padding and keeps numeric order so you don’t accidentally move future files.
B. Even better: sidecar “.done” markers (idempotent)
Have the ingester drop a marker file after each success:
# after committing file 0082.txt
touch /mnt/storage/pile_uncopyrighted/0082.txt.done
Then cleanup simply becomes:
# dry-run
find "$SRC" -maxdepth 1 -type f -name '*.txt.done' \
| sed 's/\.done$//' \
| sed 's|^| -> |'
# move the paired .txt and remove .done
while IFS= read -r d; do
f="${d%.done}"
mv -v "$f" "$ARCH"/
rm -v "$d"
done < <(find "$SRC" -maxdepth 1 -type f -name '*.txt.done' | sort -V)
This avoids any off-by-one risk: only files with a .done exist are moved.
C. Store progress in Postgres (for perfect parity)
Create a tiny control table and update it in the same transaction as your inserts:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS ingest_log (
filename text PRIMARY KEY,
finished_at timestamptz DEFAULT now()
);
In your ingest script (pseudo-flow):
1) BEGIN;
2) Insert chunks for FILENAME
3) INSERT INTO ingest_log(filename) VALUES ($FILENAME) ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING;
4) COMMIT;
5) Write the .done file or update the checkpoint file.
Now you can list finished files:
SELECT filename FROM ingest_log ORDER BY filename;
Cleanup by DB truth (dry-run):
psql -tA -U oogway_ro ougway_db \
-c "SELECT filename FROM ingest_log ORDER BY 1" \
| while read -r f; do
test -f "$SRC/$f" && echo " -> $SRC/$f"
done
Then replace echo with mv when satisfied.
D. Quick integrity guardrails
- Lockfile around the mover so it never overlaps itself:
bash
exec 9>/tmp/ingest_cleanup.lock
flock -n 9 || { echo "cleanup already running"; exit 1; }
# ... do work ... - Never move the file currently being ingested. The
.donemarker or the checkpoint seq ensures that. - Checksum optional (if you want belt-and-suspenders):
bash
sha256sum "$SRC/0082.txt" > "$SRC/0082.txt.sha256"
mv "$SRC/0082.txt" "$ARCH/"
( cd "$ARCH" && sha256sum -c "0082.txt.sha256" )
E. If you later want auto-prune
Drop a tiny cron job that runs every night and archives all .done files:
# /etc/cron.daily/ingest-archive
#!/bin/bash
SRC="/mnt/storage/pile_uncopyrighted"
ARCH="/mnt/storage/pile_archived"
mkdir -p "$ARCH"
find "$SRC" -maxdepth 1 -type f -name '*.txt.done' | sort -V | while read -r d; do
f="${d%.done}"
mv -v "$f" "$ARCH"/ && rm -v "$d"
done
chmod +x /etc/cron.daily/ingest-archive
TL;DR
- Keep a checkpoint (seq) or .done sidecars; both are safe.
- Archive then delete (dry-run first).
- Optionally mirror truth from
ingest_login Postgres for perfect alignment with actual commits.
Say the word if you want me to tailor a 20-line bash script around your exact paths and filenames — drop it in /usr/local/bin/ingest-clean and you’re done.
Yeah, that's a long way off though. I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna remove anything yet. I'm gonna wait till it gets to the almost full point, because I don't think I'm gonna save that data. I think I'm just gonna delete it. I have more important data that I want to ingest here soon, and actually while this is ingesting the pile, I'm gonna be gathering that data together so that it can be ingested and getting it ready. First and foremost, I'm gonna take every one of our conversations and clean it of all the irrelevant crap, which is gonna take some time. So, we'll start there, I think.
That sounds like a solid plan. 👍 You’ve got two layers of work here:
- Let the pile finish filling the tank — it’s good test fuel for your ingestion pipeline, and you don’t risk losing momentum by micromanaging cleanup too early.
- Curate the “real” corpus — cleaning our conversations into lean, relevant text will be far more valuable than random bulk text, because it matches the domain Ougway is actually supposed to think in.
A few tips that might help when you start the curation step:
- Keep context but trim chatter: Preserve the back-and-forth structure where it carries meaning (question/answer, challenge/response). Cut filler like “thanks,” “good morning,” or retries.
- Use clear markers: Something like
=== SESSION START (2024-06-12) ===
Darren: ...
Echo: ...
=== SESSION END ===
That way ingestion chunks preserve session boundaries. - Normalize formatting: Markdown (with
#headers, lists, code fences) is your friend. It’ll give Ougway cleaner tokens and easier retrieval later. - Chunk consciously: You may want longer contiguous chunks (say 1–2k tokens) for our material, since conversations often carry meaning across multiple turns. The default pile chunking is probably much smaller.
- Source tagging: Give each doc/chunk a
source="chatgpt_logs"and maybe atag="curated"so you can query or weight them separately from pile junk.
That way when you swap over from “synthetic test data” to “Ougway’s actual knowledge base,” it’ll be easy to isolate the valuable stuff.
Do you want me to draft you a cleanup template (like a script or checklist) for processing our chats into those structured, ingestion-ready files? That way when you’re ready, you don’t have to invent the format from scratch.
You have this lovely explanation of what my video card was doing to the data when it's tokenizing this stuff to apply it to the pgVector database. Could you give me a short blurb on just what it's doing so I can post it on Farsight because there's still some questions.
Got it — here’s a short, plain-language blurb you can drop straight into Farsight:
When we say the GPU is “tokenizing” the data before it goes into pgVector, what’s really happening is this: the text is broken down into tokens (small word-pieces) and then passed through an embedding model running on the graphics card. The GPU is used because it can do thousands of matrix multiplications in parallel, which is what the model needs to turn text into math.
The end result is that each chunk of text gets converted into a vector — basically a long list of numbers (in our case, 768 values) that capture the meaning of the text. Those vectors are then stored in PostgreSQL with the pgVector extension. Later, when you query the database, your question is converted the same way and compared to the stored vectors, so the system can pull back the chunks that are closest in meaning.
Would you like me to make an even tighter “one-liner” version for folks who don’t care about the math, just the gist?
Pages: 1 2
